GTX 680 Vs GTX480's in sli Benchmarks !!!!

I got my 680 yesterday :clap: and thought i would do a benchmark thread on how a single GTX 680 would do against 2 GTX 480's!!  Please forgive the screenshots. i really didint feel like cropping every picture. 

3dmark 11480 sli entry 680 entry
480 sli performance 680 performance
480 sli extreme 680 extreme 
3dMark Vantage
480 sli680

Heaven Benchmark 3.0:
settings in pictures (first set of images are default settings) second set will be with settings turned to high
STOCK SETTINGS480sli

680

HIGH SETTINGS480 sli

680

Batman Arkham city:settings-
Fullscreen= yesRes= 1920x1080Vsync= noAA= fxaa Medium3D = offDx11= mvss and HBAOdx11 tessellation= HighDetail Level= exctremeDynamic shadows= yesmotion blur=  yesdistortion= yeslens flares= yeslight shafts= yesreflections= yesambient occlusion= yesphysx = off
480 sli680 
same settings but with 4Xmsaa (rather than fxaa med
480 sli680

Dirt 3: DX11settings- 1920x10804xmsaaUltra pre-set 

480sli 680
Crysis 2: DX11settings- ultra pre set.  picture shows 3 different benches (in one picture)
480 sli680 
Crysis 1: DX10settings- very high 4xaa
480sli680

Good work!
 
*Note* Moving to Overclocking/Benching category...

PhysX off??
 
In Batman??
 
In Gods name, why??  That game looks SOOO much better with the PhysX effects.  It's really one of the true standout titles for the technology!
 
(Heck, keep one of those 480s, and use it for a dedicated PhysX card alongside the 680!  )

xanderf

PhysX off??

In Batman??

In Gods name, why??  That game looks SOOO much better with the PhysX effects.  It's really one of the true standout titles for the technology!

(Heck, keep one of those 480s, and use it for a dedicated PhysX card alongside the 680!  )

 
i thought it would cause wired scores cause 2 cards vs one. and im not sure how physx is handled while in sli vs single card.  (plus i think its pretty bugged for performance in batman) (plus ati fans would not be able to compare) 
 
i have a few more to post (metro 2033 and just cause 2) but im tired so ill post those later

atm743
(plus ati fans would not be able to compare) 

 
Oh, I think we already know how ATI fans feel in any thread talking about the 680:
 

this is awesome coz I have gtx 480 sli too. Will buy 1 GTX 680 hydro copper soon.

WoW great to now this since i had a SLI GTX 480 and one of them died so I ordered at GTX 680.

Less power and heat for almost the same exact performance, nice trade up.

Thanks man.  I will stick with my 480's atm then ^.^

loveha

Less power and heat for almost the same exact performance, nice trade up.

i mean I guess if thats your thing? i dont understand the idea behind, selling what you have and paying more money for less performance~same performance. meh.

so later on another 680 can be added , beats adding another 480, no ?

spawn447

so later on another 680 can be added , beats adding another 480, no ?

with that mentality id rather wait for the GK110.. which is what im planning.
 
Anyways, BTW Thank you OP for all the info!!!

Thanks so much for this thread.  I am so glad I got rid of my gtx 480 sli now!  LOL - its almost the same exact performance, but I will be saving lots of money on my power bill with my gtx 680!
 

lol can someone do the math to see how long it would take for lets pretend, him to see 100 dollars worth of actual savings? im actually really curious.

bhk1004

lol can someone do the math to see how long it would take for lets pretend, him to see 100 dollars worth of actual savings? im actually really curious.

 
In this recession every penny saved is worthwhile

Thanks for this thread!
Think I'll wait for the 4GB version, should be a bit better for 2560x1440 I guess...
 
Too bad there is no BF3 comparison but I'm not trying to be unthankful here! :)

ShurikenAngel

Thanks man.  I will stick with my 480's atm then ^.^

Same here.

Rjohnson11

That's the whole point. I'm asking how long it'll take or him to see the 100-150 extra he's paying for a 680 over his 480 sli in power savings.

It's like the whole mentality of buying a hybrid. I believe for the same car to see a savings in going hybrid they say it takes 5 years. To me that doesn't make it worth it.

I can't see spending money to have the same performance you have. Ok..less heat and money..enough to justify the hassle of trading out all the parts and selling the 480's? I don't see the point. I will be waiting for the real Kepler to arrive...but thanks for all the hard work showing the perfomance comparison atm743! I appreciate it.

Nice benches, but why did you set all your high-setting benches only to 4x AA?   I don't think you should hold back in any benches for a 2way SLI 480 vs a 680 comparison, on extreme settings.  Even at 1080i, both card should still perform really well, and thus provide good scores.  Could you provide avg Mem usage on the sides of each benches too?
 
Nice job, though.
 

Thanks OP. I appreciate the comparison. Im currently gaming with a single GTX480 and seeing the comparison of two of my cards vs. one GTX680 really shows me that its a worthwhile upgrade. I game on just a single 1200p monitor so 2gb of vram is plenty for me. I cant wait to be able to move on to a much quieter and cooler running card.
 
Does anyone know if EVGA is going to offer a non reference air cooled 680 that cools better than reference? Although the 680's cooling is far superior to my 480, I cant help but feel its performance could be even greater with a non reference cooling design.

I think the important thing to take away is that the 680 has higher minimum fps on most of the titles and that is useful in multiplayer where that random fps drop can cause you to get murdered. Although in MP most of those effects should be off anyway it allows you to see people easier.

Nice work and it's coming from a typical user. It shows for older GPU users to just move to the 600 series if they want to upgrade.

naokiura

Nice work and it's coming from a typical user. It shows for older GPU users to just move to the 600 series if they want to upgrade.

I am not exactly sure. im really curious. are you and I looking at completely different benchmarks?
 
all I see is, if heat and your electricity bill is too high you should move up, if not the 480s majority of the time performs better.

Need more benchmarks LOL. It's just fun looking at the numbers.

Nice post , real informative.  thanks.

I think a couple of people in this thread over looked that this is (2) GTX 480's in SLI vs (1) GTX 680. This is amazing, even (2) 470's demolished a GTX 580 Classy in most benchies if I remember right. So the fact that a 680 keeps up and beats the 480's  in Minimum FPS (this is the one that causes stuttering) means that the 680 is one powerful card!

Thanks for the comparison, but not enough to convince me not to wait for the GK110.  I run my 480s at 875/2100 and with my old 980X, my Vantage score is almost 45K, now with the 3960X I guess I should be getting a few 1000s more.

bhk1004

lol can someone do the math to see how long it would take for lets pretend, him to see 100 dollars worth of actual savings? im actually really curious.

If he's the 24/7 on and folding type, he will probably see $20 reduction in electric bill after a year.  For normal use, I don't believe he will ever see a difference. 

bhk1004

naokiura

Nice work and it's coming from a typical user. It shows for older GPU users to just move to the 600 series if they want to upgrade.

I am not exactly sure. im really curious. are you and I looking at completely different benchmarks?

all I see is, if heat and your electricity bill is too high you should move up, if not the 480s majority of the time performs better.

 
You are correct that the SLI GTX 480’s does perform a little better than a single 680. In my opinion most who will upgrade their systems will want some type of future proofing, cost efficiency, along with playing with high settings or Ultra if possible and the possibility of going to multi-monitor. At least that is what I read on the forums in general, not just EVGA by the way.
So if someone wants to go from a GTX 260 to a better card but is thinking about or will be doing SLI, 2 – GTX 480 @ 1.5Gb will be about $500 for the 2 cards right now,  might as well get a GTX 680 2Gb for $500.
Even if you have a single GTX 480 but thinking about going to a Multi-Monitor system, a GTX 680 might be a better option than getting another GTX 480 because of the memory and/or if the person might be thinking of going three way GPU for the Multi-Monitor.
 
According to this article , a single GTX 680 did the same demo that took 3 GTX 580’s to do and you can put on a forth monitor on the GTX 680 at the same time. <-- I don't know how it will affect gaming but you can from what I'm reading.
 
For me personally, the only thing that would make me upgrade is the 4Gb model, but right now even playing BF3 on Ultra doesn’t make sense for me to upgrade, unless a new game comes out that will force me to play on medium setting with my 3 GTX 580's.
 
 

hey guys i updated the thread. photobucket i guess has a bandwidth cap and i hit the 10gb monthly cap in 3 days!! i have this thread on one other forum (ocforums). i just re-hosted them to a different site so the images should be good now. 
 
also for the guys saying that the 480sli is better. if you must have a bigger E-peen and beat someone in benchmarks then yes the 480 is better but like others said. the single 680 does VERY VERY close to the sli rig and it uses less a crap ton less power. when going to my single 680. my computer temps have gone down a crap ton. i have a good case with more than enough air flow. my cpu idle and load temps dropped 5 or more C and because of this i lowered the speeds of my fans and still getting better temps!!!  

The people aren't arguing over epeen. Trying to silence the people that are saying its a go ahead upgrade to a 680. When in reality it's a slight downgrade in performance so it's spending money to more of a lateral move. If there are plans for future sli then yes go ahead. But many people want better performance when they upgrade. Which is why for me personally want a card that out performs my 480s in sli before breaking down my computer and emptying out my wallet.

the benchmarks show slightly less performance than the 480's yes, but in reality for games. the 480's in sli were way above 60 fps in every game with max settings at 1080.  if you're not doing 3D and not doing multi monitor gaming. a single 680 is well worth the 100 bucks you put into it.  
 
it sounds stupid i know, but its worth the upgrade. plus being that its close to summer, im more than happy to pay 100 bucks to have less power and MUCH less heat coming from my computer. 
 
 

atm743

the benchmarks show slightly less performance than the 480's yes, but in reality for games. the 480's in sli were way above 60 fps in every game with max settings at 1080.  if you're not doing 3D and not doing multi monitor gaming. a single 680 is well worth the 100 bucks you put into it.  

it sounds stupid i know, but its worth the upgrade. plus being that its close to summer, im more than happy to pay 100 bucks to have less power and MUCH less heat coming from my computer. 

I mean I guess the sake of also getting rid of SLI might be worth it to some.. and definitely the heat argument is very valid for many folks. I am underwater so makes no point for me. maybe its also making me even more stubborn to upgrading ^_^  completely holding out till the gk110 comes out.

I'm keeping my 480's. water cooling and over clocking them until Nvidia rolls out the big guns .

I don't have screenshots, but here are the results...
 
Lost Planet 2:
Test A: GTX 480 SLI: 115.7 fps --- GTX 680: 106.4 fps
Test B: GTX 480 SLI: 77.6 fps -- GTX 680: 79.6 fps
 
Arkham Asylum PhysX High:
GTX 480 SLI: 141 -- GTX 680: 138
 
Mafia II PhysX high:
GTX 480 SLI: 48.4 -- GTX 680: 47.5
 
Just Cause 2:
Dark Tower: GTX 480 SLI 84.97 -- GTX 680 72.32
Desert Sunrise: GTX 480 SLI 101.05 -- GTX 680 118.21
Concrete Jungle: GTX 480 SLI 52.39 -- GTX 680 56.33
 
3dMark11 Extreme Level:
GTX 480 SLI: Graphics score 3094 -- GTX 680 3455
 
Aliens vs Predator DX11:
GTX 480 SLI: 72.2 -- GTX 680 55.6
 
Crysis DX10:
GTX 480 SLI: 55.57 -- GTX 680 55.6
 
Far Cry 2 DX10:
GTX 480 SLI: 150.54 -- GTX 680: 156.26

"Oh, I think we already know how ATI fans feel in any thread talking about the 680":

Hell yeah.  Eat it AMD!!  Good call.

bhk1004

loveha

Less power and heat for almost the same exact performance, nice trade up.

i mean I guess if thats your thing? i dont understand the idea behind, selling what you have and paying more money for less performance~same performance. meh.

I would tend to agree.  But when you slap another one in there, those bastards are gonna scale really well in SLI.

2 of the 4GB Classified 680s are gonna be legendary for 3D surround.  Should be able to play BF3 and Crysis 2 in 3d Surround.  I can't play them at what I would consider a decent frame rate with my 3GB 580s.  Memory amount is not the issue here, although, 2 GB is not enough for 3d Surround.  Many games use more than that.

good work

Tyvm for all the information. I am going to step up to a 680.

First I say thanks to the OP for taking the time to get us those numbers.
Second, to all the people calling this move (GTX480SLI to GTX680) a downgrade, you are clearly don't seem to understand what really matters when it comes to 3D graphics performance.
 
Going from Max/Min of say 157.6/13.8 to 146.6/30.4 is NOT a downgrade, that's an UPGRADE. 1) Your monitor can't show you more than 120Hz except in a few RARE cases so anything over 120FPS is a waste of money/power/etc.  2) When playing a real game, if your framerate drops to 13FPS and you've spent ~$500+ on graphics cards, you've either been had, or don't know how to setup your rig. Since the human brain needs at least 30 FPS to perceive motion, you NEVER want to drop below that point. 3) If your monitor can display 60 FPS (60Hz as most LCDs do), you ideally never want to drop much below that.
 
So who cares if you can get 1000FPS in any case, you SHOULD prefer a higher MIN (and ideally AVG as many of these reported) in all cases. Furthermore, for those that didn't know, SLI 1.5GB cards isn't a 3GB setup, it's 1.5GB and that means you can't increase MSAA type features as high as when you have 2GB (even on a single GPU). That matters for those of us running 2560x1600 (even for just one monitor, forget surround gaming).
 
In summary, if the MAX is even close but the MIN goes up (DOUBLES as is the case with many of these tests), then it is an upgrade. In case it wasn't clear, if you're not running a 120Hz monitor, then anything over 60FPS is also a waste and since you should be running VSYNC (to avoid tearing), you'll never see anything over 60 anyway.
 
:)

flips coin = downgrade , costs peeps nothing to keep[480sli] what they have.
-next year 2 x 680's will look like a budget set up , same as it has every year when new tech. comes out.
-if nv put 2 gb on the ref. 680's today ,you will need/want 4 gb for sli in next year's games..same as always .

rjohnson11

bhk1004

lol can someone do the math to see how long it would take for lets pretend, him to see 100 dollars worth of actual savings? im actually really curious.

In this recession every penny saved is worthwhile

 
Thats so true, but here we are talking about saving penny's on an electrical bill and the recession, but he goes out and blows 500.00+ on a video card and he had working cards already...now thats smart!

Thanks for thread OP - good information.  680 is a beast - but obviously 480 SLI users should stick with what they have.

excellent read ...
 
480 sli almost rapes the 680 ....thats music to my ears .
 
nice thread bro
 

that is nice work on benching and comparisons. I really like how a single 680 stands at same level as 480 SLI, that shows the nice improvement of nvida gpus
 
for same reason I sold my 275 SLI and swapped it with a single 570 some time ago. much less heat and much lower power bill while same performance pretty much (or higher in my case it was, plus added DX10,11 benefits, etc.). ... a year later I added another 570 to SLI and that's what I am rocking now.
 
a single 680 should be able to drive most of games nicely for some time.

thank you for this now i just wish i knew if it's worth the extra money to buy a i7 3600k or should i save a few bucks and get a amd 8350? my email is agurobe6@yahoo.com thank you my corrent pc setup is a 7200 rpm hdd 12 gigs of 10666 ram gtx480 amd quad core 2.8 ghz penom 2 850 watt power supply  so im just wanting a nice improvement over my corrent cpu :) thank you

you will see a very decent performance boost going to a 3770K from your current cpu. 
 
im thinking you have ddr2 ram (im rusty with amd stuff) but if you do you need new ram and motherboard with the new cpu. 
 
personally i would wait till haswell to do any cpu upgrades but if you really want you could always look for a used or cheap 2500K and you'll be set. ive seen them go for pretty decent price on here and other places.
 
 

my bad dude yeah i have ddr3 12 gigs i have never seen someone with a gtx480 and quad core cpu have ddr2 lol not a shot at you i just have never seen that the ram is so inexpensive and the ddr3 boards the same but any who i can run almost any game on half high half ultra without a problem about 25 to 40 fps average

Nice set of tests! Thanks!

Thank you.  I was considering upgrading my 3x 470s to a 680 so that I could have a free pcie slot for a hardware raid controller that I have.  I would probably need to get two 680s to have better performance.  I am not sure if it is worth the upgrade yet considering I have an SSD hard drive.