Guys, please compare my 9400GT benchmark to this other person's 9400GT benchmark and tell me what you think.
How can it be that he has a higher score?
Why does he have no picture and no verification URL?
Run it again, you're way off of all his GPU tests... way off
Over a period of months, I have run it at least 20 times. I have tried everything.
I have tried:
1) Slower clocks in case there was some unseen stability problems somewhere
2) HT off with faster CPU speed
3) Two different motherboards
4) Different operating systems
5) Different air coolers and even phase change
I did one run on phase and got pissed off and started this rant. I never submitted my phase run, but it was at 1000/2000/648 and my score was still 100 points too low. So, I have to overclock to 1100/2100/648 to beat his score when he is at a pathetic overclock!?
It is BS I say! I know I am WAY off of his scores. And that is the problem. His scores are impossible I tell you! Coming from my experience over these months of trying, something is wrong with his scores. My overclocks and setup is ridiculously better than his, but yet he has an impossible to beat score. His problem is that he has no proof other than a screenshot. My opinion is that his screenshot is either photoshopped or GPU-z detected his card as a DDR2 card when it is actually a DDR3 card.
I have first place with the 9400GT in 3dm03, 3dm05, and Vantage. Isn't it suspicious that the ONLY benchmark he has benchmarked the 9400GT, his score is impossibly high and he has no proof?
<message edited by ty_ger07 on Tuesday, February 21, 2012 5:17 PM>