I just had an 445wu (P3470) on my GTS250 card and that WU was flying (high ppd and low temp):
Compared to 353wu: ~30% higher ppd and ~10c lower temp.
 
I've searched the FAH-Forums and could not find any info.
But I found info at FAH-Addict: New nVidia GPU2 projects: 3469 and 3470
 
I'm curious how my GTX275 card will perform running this WU.

I haven't seen any yet but if/when I do I'll post

I get 9500 ppd on stock gtx285s with the 353s
and 9000 ppd (x2) with the gtx295s

I had just one sofar.

On my GTS250 I get 6777 ppd with the 353wu's ... but 8738 ppd with the 445wu.

Have not picked one up so far. Just have to wait and see.

Checked my benchmarks in HFM and I had one on my 9800GT. I would like to see how many ppd my 260's get.

Project ID: 3470
 Core: GROGPU2
 Credit: 445
 Frames: 100

 Name: 9800GT
 Path: \\Fold-rig-2\f@h\GPU_2\
 Number of Frames Observed: 99

 Min. Time / Frame : 00:00:49 - 7,847 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:00:49 - 7,847 PPD

Glad to hear some good news for Nvidia clients for a change

Project ID: 3469
 Min. Time / Frame : 00:00:59 - 6,589.8 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:00:59 - 6,589.8 PPD

Pretty good for a 9600GSO

Had one early today 7864PPD on a 9800gt 50 degrees on the temp. I'll take them ALL nite long.

I'd like to see what kinda PPD I would get on a 285.

Foldmiester


Glad to hear some good news for Nvidia clients for a change

it seems the less atoms in the WU the lower heat and higher ppd. most of the recent projects have been ports of ATI (548) and PS3 (445) clients to double check results, gain higher accuracy, and speed up computing too.

 Project ID: 3470
 Core: GROGPU2
 Credit: 445
 Frames: 100


 Name: 9800 GT
 Path: C:\Program Files (x86)\Folding@home\GPU1\
 Number of Frames Observed: 99

 Min. Time / Frame : 00:01:10 - 5,492.6 PPD
 Avg. Time / Frame : 00:01:10 - 5,492.6 PPD

But I have a lower power 9800GT, still I'm not complaining

I picked up some new WU's, 445's, 450's and 375's. The odd thing is the 9800 series cards love them and are crushing the PPD but the GTX cards do not like them and the PPD is lower. Just thought that was odd.

I just got bunch of 783wu, and the PPD is decent. 9020.2 on GTX260

I have been getting those off and on for about a week and they actually have been a couple hundred PPD faster than the 353 pointers on the GTX 285 but slower on the 9800 series. Again odd.

I picked up a 783 on my 8800GT today. I see 6100 PPD with the 353's and 5600 PPD with the 783's.

783 pointers are a tad faster than 353 pointers on my GTX 295's. Never got those 445 pointers though...

theGryphon


783 pointers are a tad faster than 353 pointers on my GTX 295's. Never got those 445 pointers though...

the 445 wu SUCKS!! 7120PPD on GTX295 , and the 783 is 8901

WB

I had a 445 the other day and my ppd dropped by 2k with this WU on my 285

According to FahMon, my 9600GT folding a Project 3470 is giving me 6300PPD. HFM.NET says 6100PPD. I usually get 3000PPD max. God I love these projects!

Edit: Whoa. I raised my core clocks and memory clocks from my usual folding speeds to a full OC setting while the shaders remained at 1800Mhz, I got an extra 1000PPD. That or the WU just automatically sped up coincidentally when I changed my clocks...

These WUs rock; my 8800GT nets roughly ~7000

My 9800GT got ~7400 ppd
oddly my 260 is getting ~7300

I can confirm that the 445 WU's are slow on the GTX275 and GTX 295 cards. The 548 and 343 WU's are much better. Luckily, I did not get many 445 WU's so far.

Does any of you have any explanation why these new units don't like G200 cards and enjoy the G92 and older GPU's???

How much CPU does it use?

geokilla


Edit: Whoa. I raised my core clocks and memory clocks from my usual folding speeds to a full OC setting while the shaders remained at 1800Mhz, I got an extra 1000PPD. That or the WU just automatically sped up coincidentally when I changed my clocks...

In Precision, what is a full OC setting?

theGryphon


Does any of you have any explanation why these new units don't like G200 cards and enjoy the G92 and older GPU's???

How much CPU does it use?

I only had one 445wu on my GTS250 so far, so I could not test it.
But have a look at the Core clockspeed of the cards and their PPD's.
 
List of results posted so far (Core clocks of reference cards in MHz):
8800 GT   = 600 (7000 ppd)
 
9600 GSO  = 600 (6590 ppd, P3469)
9600 GT   = 600 (6300 ppd)
9800 GT   = 600 (7400 - 7860 ppd, low power version = 5490 ppd)
 
GTS 250   = 738 (8740 ppd, core = 725)
GTX 260   = 576 (7300 ppd)
GTX 295   = 576 (7120 ppd)
 
And Geokilla did see a PPD increase after raising his Core & Mem clocks.
 

geokilla

 
Edit: Whoa. I raised my core clocks and memory clocks from my usual folding speeds to a full OC setting while the shaders remained at 1800Mhz, I got an extra 1000PPD. That or the WU just automatically sped up coincidentally when I changed my clocks...

 

My 9800GT ran at 7934.69 ppd on project 3469, had about 2 I think.

Edit:  Core Clock      700
         Shader Clock  1790
         Memory           950

Why are they double the points the ps3 receives for one of these gpu - 450 points    ps3 - 250 points?

Ran a 450 on my 9600gso and the ppd went up 2000 to 5800 ppd and temps at 56C I hope I keep getting those, this little card seems to love them.  

It's very interesting... So this WU runs off of the Core and Memory it seems... Just the opposite of all the rest

this needs to be tested more thoroughly because core clock should have no influence on gpgpu. all it does is rasterize pixels in a fixed function pipeline.

sirgrinalot


My 9800GT ran at 7934.69 ppd on project 3469, had about 2 I think.

Edit:  Core Clock      700
        Shader Clock  1790
        Memory           950

Why are they double the points the ps3 receives for one of these gpu - 450 points    ps3 - 250 points?

the nvidia client is more accurate and stanford has high priority for gpu's to finish this work.

wb488641


I just got bunch of 783wu, and the PPD is decent. 9020.2 on GTX260

I've gotten a few 783 also but doing slightly lower 8352ppd on my GTX 260 with shader = 1472

WB what shader are you running on your 260?