Sciential
-
Total Posts
:
10
- Joined: 7/3/2012
-
Status: offline
-
|
680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:06 PM
( permalink)
Hi, I'm trying to decide between the EVGA 680, FTW+ and Classified. I'd like to get the quietest card running at stock settings, I probably won't overclock the card , which of these cards runs quietest at stock settings? Does the 680 Classified exhaust all of it's hot air outside of the case? It looks like it does from the pictures but a review claims otherwise EVGA made the I/O panel air exhausts bigger to improve airflow but one part of the cooler will stay behind. Unfortunately, this means that some of the hot air will remain in the case. I have a TJ08-E case and it has extra ventilation holes next to the I/O ports I am very keen to have all the hot air exhausted out the back. Thanks
<message edited by Sciential on Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:09 PM>
|
|
|
|
boylerya
-
Total Posts
:
905
- Joined: 11/23/2008
-
Status: offline
- Folding: 487,438
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:10 PM
( permalink)
GTX680 is a 2GB VRAM card w/ two 6pin connectors GTX680 FTW+ is a 4GB VRAM card w/ 8pin and 6pin connectors GTX680 Classified is a 4GB VRAM card w/ 8pin and 6pin connectors, intended for enthusiasts for OCing. I recommend the GTX680 FTW+ 4GB, the fan should run as loud as the vanilla GTX680.
|
|
|
|
boredgunner
-
Total Posts
:
18255
- Joined: 7/17/2008
- Location: Лиманск-13
-
Status: online
- Ribbons: 78
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:13 PM
( permalink)
All three cards are external exhaust. The FTW is probably best, the Classified is overkill but will run cooler and quieter.
peeler05 half of skyrim is traveling or alt tabing to google how to play the game. gutcheck I just left my son in the sink to run upstairs and download Black Mesa
|
|
|
|
Sciential
-
Total Posts
:
10
- Joined: 7/3/2012
-
Status: offline
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:20 PM
( permalink)
I can get the Classified for slightly cheaper than the FTW at the moment, would there be any reason not to get it over the FTW?
|
|
|
|
WannaB
-
Total Posts
:
268
- Joined: 11/23/2009
- Location: NC
-
Status: offline
- Folding: 16,748
-
-

|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:45 PM
( permalink)
|
|
|
|
sk3tch
-
Total Posts
:
221
- Joined: 7/11/2007
-
Status: offline
- Ribbons: 3
-
-

|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 4:05 PM
( permalink)
I got rid of 4x FTW+ 4GB cards - too hot. Classified is leagues better - even without EVBot. Spend the extra $30. Well worth it. Much cooler.
|
|
|
|
ZelmoQuad
-
Total Posts
:
731
- Joined: 12/1/2005
- Location: Columbus, OH
-
Status: offline
- Ribbons: 5
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 4:38 PM
( permalink)
To all with the 680's. What does Precision report for Mem usage in-game? And which game was it measured in? I run two 580s (1.5G VRAM each)in SLI and each report peaks of 1440 with a range typpically of 1429-1440. This is in BF3 and a 3-27" Span setup. Next cards, what ever the be, will be 4G/
HAF X Nvidia-ASUS IV Formula/i7 3930K/Thermaltake Water2-Extreme/OCZ Vertex IV 120 & Raptor 500/16G Corsair Dominator GT 2133C9/2way- GTX580 SLI/CM SPM2 1500W on 3x LG 24" Surround. Cosmos-S-ASUS P8P67 WS Rev/i7 2600K/Kuhler 920/Raptor 300 /16G Ripjaw DDR3-1600/ GTX480 SLI/Thtk 1200W HAF XM- Gigabyte Z68XUD3H-B3/2500K/Corsair H80/16G/Vengeance DDR3-1600/ GTX285/CM Silent Pro Gold 800W Stryker -Wht - ASUS Maximus-V Gene/3770K/Kuhler 920/8G Patriot G 1600/ GTX295 CO-OP/C-M V-Sereis 1000W
|
|
|
|
sk3tch
-
Total Posts
:
221
- Joined: 7/11/2007
-
Status: offline
- Ribbons: 3
-
-

|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:48 PM
( permalink)
BF3 will use what it has. I've had 2GB 680s and now 4GB. All at 5760x1080/120hz and the performance has been basically the same. It's not a game that needs 4GB. That said, I have seen as high as 2700MB in Precision X.
|
|
|
|
sk2play
-
Total Posts
:
2528
- Joined: 7/12/2009
- Location: Westminster, CO
-
Status: offline
- Ribbons: 5
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 6:36 PM
( permalink)
Good to know sk3tch especially with your res & refresh rates. I couldn't see any difference between SLI 580 1.5gb and SLI 670 FTW 2gb setups. People are playing with 570 1.25gb and 560 1gb with BF3 without hiccups either. It is indeed because nVidia has optimized the drivers to a specific card. They even pinpoint your % increase per card series in the driver updates. I went for more speed vs more vram when calculating the cost at my res But if you want it all, go 4gb. Just don't expect to see any difference in graphics eye candy or real game play performance as your racing thru the FPS or RPG games.
CASE ANTEC 900 (ver 1) -- MB EVGA E760-A1 X58 Classified -- CPU = I7 975 3.33G OC'd 1.325v @ 30x133 4.0Ghz -- Noctua NH-U12P SE1366 -- CORSAIR VENGEANCE 12gb 1.5V RAM CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 @ 1600MHz .-- EVGA GTX670 FTW SLI -- PSU CORSAIR 1200AX -- Plextor PX512M3 SSD primary- 2 Seagate 2TB 7200rpm 64mg cache HDD -- SB xFi HD via optical to Onkyo TX-DS676 w/ Bose 201's & Klipsch Sub XW-300d - HP ZR30w 30" S-IPS LCD -- W7\W8 boot [link=http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=75593]http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=75
|
|
|
|
sk3tch
-
Total Posts
:
221
- Joined: 7/11/2007
-
Status: offline
- Ribbons: 3
-
-

|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 6:53 PM
( permalink)
Here's a pic that I couldn't reference earlier because I was on a mobile device. I'm pretty obsessed with BF3 MP3 (it's about 90% of what I play) and really the only thing that helps performance is faster clock speed, memory speed, and more cards. :) As long as you have 1GB or more VRAM you're probably good. 2GB for triple monitor. The best thing I ever did was turn down some settings. Even with 4-way 6xx SLI - you have to make some compromises. :) Here's what I use now:
|
|
|
|
sk3tch
-
Total Posts
:
221
- Joined: 7/11/2007
-
Status: offline
- Ribbons: 3
-
-

|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 8:49 PM
( permalink)
Sorry repost - delete
|
|
|
|
gx2_monster
-
Total Posts
:
116
- Joined: 10/29/2008
-
Status: offline
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Thursday, August 02, 2012 9:27 PM
( permalink)
Classified is 8 + 8 pin. I would get the 680 FTW 4gb for sure unless you plan to heavily OC and mod the card.. ;) Classified is rubbish gimmick this time round as mine only does stable 1280mhz and my brothers FTW 4gb hits 1300mhz.. LOL All luck of the draw with clocks though...
<message edited by gx2_monster on Thursday, August 02, 2012 9:30 PM>
|
|
|
|
USFORCES
-
Total Posts
:
477
- Joined: 12/13/2006
-
Status: offline
- Ribbons: 3
-
-

|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Friday, August 03, 2012 3:08 AM
( permalink)
FTW is for gamers, Classified is for kingpin and bench testing if that's your thing and or the PSU god only gives you three 6+8 pci-e cables like he did me.
|
|
|
|
HAZMAN_THE_GREAT
-
Total Posts
:
2344
- Joined: 12/1/2011
- Location: Planet Earth
-
Status: offline
- Ribbons: 3
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Friday, August 03, 2012 3:21 AM
( permalink)
USFORCES FTW is for gamers, Classified is for kingpin and bench testing if that's your thing and or the PSU god only gives you three 6+8 pci-e cables like he did me. +1 that was the best reason I read.
|
|
|
|
dyceskynes
-
Total Posts
:
87
- Joined: 5/22/2009
-
Status: offline
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Friday, August 03, 2012 7:03 AM
( permalink)
You can't put a full waterblock on a FTW. Go for GTX680 4gb or Classified.
Intel Core I7 3930K @ 3.5 | 16GB Corsair Vengence 1600 MHZ | EVGA X79 FTW | EVGA GTX 680 Classified x2 | EVGA 650Ti | 128GB Vertex 4 SSD x2 Raid 0 | 500 GB WD x2 | Seasonic PLATINUM-1000 | XSPC Raystorm | Win 7 Ultimate
|
|
|
|
Sciential
-
Total Posts
:
10
- Joined: 7/3/2012
-
Status: offline
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Friday, August 03, 2012 8:05 AM
( permalink)
So the Classified will run cooler and quieter at stock settings vs the FTW at stock settings?
|
|
|
|
sk3tch
-
Total Posts
:
221
- Joined: 7/11/2007
-
Status: offline
- Ribbons: 3
-
-

|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Friday, August 03, 2012 8:46 AM
( permalink)
Sciential So the Classified will run cooler and quieter at stock settings vs the FTW at stock settings? Yes. I don't understand why there's even a debate - it's only $30 more from FTW+ to Classified. Go Classified. If, for nothing else, that it will have better resale value down the road when you upgrade. Everyone wants a Classified. :) If it's a money thing - throw it all out and buy a 670 4GB. Best bang/buck.
|
|
|
|
Gerann
-
Total Posts
:
91
- Joined: 12/29/2008
-
Status: offline
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Friday, August 03, 2012 9:27 AM
( permalink)
Sciential I can get the Classified for slightly cheaper than the FTW at the moment, would there be any reason not to get it over the FTW? No-brainer then, get the Classified. Yes it will run cooler and quieter. Where are you getting it cheaper? ;)
|
|
|
|
Sciential
-
Total Posts
:
10
- Joined: 7/3/2012
-
Status: offline
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Saturday, August 04, 2012 3:14 PM
( permalink)
The Classified is currently £10 cheaper than the 4GB FTW at Overclockers, so I guess it makes sense to go with the Classified. I'm only really concerned with the noise as I won't be overclocking.
|
|
|
|
boredgunner
-
Total Posts
:
18255
- Joined: 7/17/2008
- Location: Лиманск-13
-
Status: online
- Ribbons: 78
-
|
Re:680 vs 680 FTW+ vs 680 Classified
Saturday, August 04, 2012 3:19 PM
( permalink)
Definitely get the Classified. It will be quieter than other 680s since it's a larger fan that is limited to 55%.
peeler05 half of skyrim is traveling or alt tabing to google how to play the game. gutcheck I just left my son in the sink to run upstairs and download Black Mesa
|
|
|
|