VMware && Linux bigadv folding

Change Page: << < ..3132 | Showing page 32 of 32, messages 931 to 956 of 956
Author Message
linuxrouter

  • Total Posts : 7751
  • Joined: 2/28/2008
  • Status: offline
  • Ribbons: 77
  • Folding: 16,596,182
Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Thursday, February 16, 2012 8:54 PM (permalink)
That is good news. Glad to here the image works with ESXi! I've been thinking of adding in the PVSCSI support since ESXi supports this adapter.
 
Edit: Now that I think about it, PVSCSI is probably already built into the native image. I'll have to double check that.
<message edited by linuxrouter on Thursday, February 16, 2012 9:02 PM>
 
    linuxrouter

    • Total Posts : 7751
    • Joined: 2/28/2008
    • Status: offline
    • Ribbons: 77
    • Folding: 16,596,182
    Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Sunday, March 25, 2012 7:12 PM (permalink)
    On the bonus calculator, I went through and marked those projects that are no longer on psummary as inactive in the database. There were actually 287 older projects no longer showing on psummary. This will help keep the main project list on the calculator a bit cleaner. There is also a link for viewing active/inactive projects towards the bottom which will load all projects including the inactive ones. This is mainly for historical purposes or for the case where a project is still active but not showing up on psummary.
    <message edited by linuxrouter on Sunday, March 25, 2012 7:13 PM>
     
      werty316

      • Total Posts : 677
      • Joined: 4/25/2005
      • Status: offline
      • Folding: 69,636,055
      Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Sunday, April 01, 2012 4:15 PM (permalink)
      I've been folding strickly in Windows ever since I started to fold but I wanted to give folding on Linux a try and this guide is freaking sweet! THX!
      <message edited by werty316 on Sunday, April 01, 2012 4:26 PM>


       
      PSA of the day: "Remember kids, its wrong to talk about ASUS."
      A "Customer Service Rating" has nothing to do with the quality of a company's product.
       
        linuxrouter

        • Total Posts : 7751
        • Joined: 2/28/2008
        • Status: offline
        • Ribbons: 77
        • Folding: 16,596,182
        Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Sunday, April 01, 2012 6:12 PM (permalink)
        Glad you like it. Thanks. :)
         
          iDreadnaught

          • Total Posts : 130
          • Joined: 4/16/2012
          • Location: Florida
          • Status: offline
          • Ribbons: 1
          • Folding: 6,280,609
          Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Saturday, May 26, 2012 6:01 AM (permalink)
          I'm using the virtualbox image, booting i7 with avx , but the configuration won't let me select/save the Sandy Bridge kernel option. What am I doing wrong? Or, should I just use the i7 kernel option?

           

           
            arvidab

            • Total Posts : 5
            • Joined: 5/13/2012
            • Status: offline
            Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Saturday, May 26, 2012 9:08 AM (permalink)
            First off, I love this build, thanks LR! Have used it both natively and in a VM, recommending and helping friends to get this running properly.

            Though I, and a few more people, have a problem running this natively with a SB. Running it inside a VM (I've only used VMWare) it gets expected results compared to native Win client and native Linux install of, say, Ubuntu.

            But running this natively the performance takes a real dive. PPD is almost half on the few SMP units I tried with my 2500K, TPF went up from 3:13 to ~4:50 on that particular unit, IIRC. I have tried all the kernel options, but no seems to solve the issue.

            Other people have came to similar conclusions.

            Is there anyone here that have similar experience running this natively on a SB CPU? Or a suggestion I can try, I'd be very grateful?

            @iDreadnaught: The -avx kernel is what you would want for a 2600K. Does it not stick if you choose in the web config?
             
              iDreadnaught

              • Total Posts : 130
              • Joined: 4/16/2012
              • Location: Florida
              • Status: offline
              • Ribbons: 1
              • Folding: 6,280,609
              Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Saturday, May 26, 2012 11:22 AM (permalink)
              Hmmmm, just rebooted and it did load the -avx kernel automatically, so I guess it's all good. The configuration just didn't keep the "Sandy Bridge" option selected as it does with the i7 option, but looks like it functions as it's supposed to.
               
              So far the PPD is more than native Windows. I'm surprised that a VBox Nix guest under a Win7 host performs as well as it does, wish I'd read this thread earlier. Haven't gone through all 32 pages of this thread yet, but hoping I can optimize it further.
               
              Sorry, haven't run the 2600K on native nix, but that does seem strange to me.

               

               
                linuxrouter

                • Total Posts : 7751
                • Joined: 2/28/2008
                • Status: offline
                • Ribbons: 77
                • Folding: 16,596,182
                Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Saturday, May 26, 2012 12:18 PM (permalink)
                iDreadnaught


                Hmmmm, just rebooted and it did load the -avx kernel automatically, so I guess it's all good. The configuration just didn't keep the "Sandy Bridge" option selected as it does with the i7 option, but looks like it functions as it's supposed to.

                So far the PPD is more than native Windows. I'm surprised that a VBox Nix guest under a Win7 host performs as well as it does, wish I'd read this thread earlier. Haven't gone through all 32 pages of this thread yet, but hoping I can optimize it further.

                Sorry, haven't run the 2600K on native nix, but that does seem strange to me.

                 
                You are right, this is a bug where the option is not auto-selected after previously selected. Thanks for me letting know. I will get this fixed.
                 
                I think the reason the reason for the performance difference is that at this time the Linux core application is more optimized than the Windows core application. In addition, the more recent versions of Virtualbox have near native performance. The performance difference of Linux in Virtualbox compared to running Linux as a native OS should be in the range of 2-5%.
                 
                  iDreadnaught

                  • Total Posts : 130
                  • Joined: 4/16/2012
                  • Location: Florida
                  • Status: offline
                  • Ribbons: 1
                  • Folding: 6,280,609
                  Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:39 PM (permalink)
                  Just finished a P6099 and seems it doesn't want to upload. Any ideas? Or problems on Stanford's end?
                   
                  Could it be related to the VBox network configuration? But, it was able to d/l the unit in the first place, and pings google fine, so I don't know.
                   
                   [00:33:31] Completed 500000 out of 500000 steps  (100%)  
                   [00:33:32] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000  
                   [00:33:42]   
                   [00:33:42] Finished Work Unit:  
                   [00:33:42] - Reading up to 12102336 from "work/wudata_01.trr": Read 12102336  
                   [00:33:42] trr file hash check passed.  
                   [00:33:42] edr file hash check passed.  
                   [00:33:42] logfile size: 65039  
                   [00:33:42] Leaving Run  
                   [00:33:47] - Writing 12201051 bytes of core data to disk...  
                   [00:33:48] Done: 12200539 -> 11296328 (compressed to 92.5 percent)  
                   [00:33:48]   ... Done.  
                   [00:33:48] - Shutting down core  
                   [00:33:48]   
                   [00:33:48] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT  
                   [00:33:48] CoreStatus = 64 (100)  
                   [00:33:48] Sending work to server  
                   [00:33:48] Project: 6099 (Run 4, Clone 22, Gen 173)  
                   
                   
                   [00:33:48] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:33:48 UTC]  
                   [00:33:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:33:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:33:48]     (128.143.231.202:8080)  
                   [00:33:48] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:33:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:33:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:33:48]     (128.143.231.202:80)  
                   [00:33:48] - Error: Could not transmit unit 01 (completed May 27) to work server.  
                   [00:33:48]   Keeping unit 01 in queue.  
                   [00:33:48] Project: 6099 (Run 4, Clone 22, Gen 173)  
                   
                   
                   [00:33:48] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:33:48 UTC]  
                   [00:33:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:33:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:33:48]     (128.143.231.202:8080)  
                   [00:33:48] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:33:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:33:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:33:48]     (128.143.231.202:80)  
                   [00:33:48] - Error: Could not transmit unit 01 (completed May 27) to work server.  
                   
                   
                   [00:33:48] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:33:48 UTC]  
                   [00:33:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:33:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:33:48]     (128.143.199.97:8080)  
                   [00:33:48] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:33:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:33:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:33:48]     (128.143.199.97:80)  
                   [00:33:48]   Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in queue.  
                   [00:34:18] Project: 6099 (Run 4, Clone 22, Gen 173)  
                   
                   
                   [00:34:18] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:34:18 UTC]  
                   [00:34:18] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:34:18] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:34:18]     (128.143.231.202:8080)  
                   [00:34:18] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:34:18] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:34:18] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:34:18]     (128.143.231.202:80)  
                   [00:34:18] - Error: Could not transmit unit 01 (completed May 27) to work server.  
                   
                   
                   [00:34:18] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:34:18 UTC]  
                   [00:34:18] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:34:18] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:34:18]     (128.143.199.97:8080)  
                   [00:34:18] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:34:18] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:34:18] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:34:18]     (128.143.199.97:80)  
                   [00:34:18]   Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in queue.  
                   [00:34:48] Project: 6099 (Run 4, Clone 22, Gen 173)  
                   
                   
                   [00:34:48] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:34:48 UTC]  
                   [00:34:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:34:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:34:48]     (128.143.231.202:8080)  
                   [00:34:48] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:34:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:34:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:34:48]     (128.143.231.202:80)  
                   [00:34:48] - Error: Could not transmit unit 01 (completed May 27) to work server.  
                   
                   
                   [00:34:48] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:34:48 UTC]  
                   [00:34:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:34:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:34:48]     (128.143.199.97:8080)  
                   [00:34:48] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:34:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:34:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:34:48]     (128.143.199.97:80)  
                   [00:34:48]   Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in queue.  
                   [00:35:18] Project: 6099 (Run 4, Clone 22, Gen 173)  
                   
                   
                   [00:35:18] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:35:18 UTC]  
                   [00:35:18] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:35:18] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:35:18]     (128.143.231.202:8080)  
                   [00:35:18] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:35:18] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:35:18] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:35:18]     (128.143.231.202:80)  
                   [00:35:18] - Error: Could not transmit unit 01 (completed May 27) to work server.  
                   
                   
                   [00:35:18] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:35:18 UTC]  
                   [00:35:18] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:35:18] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:35:18]     (128.143.199.97:8080)  
                   [00:35:18] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:35:18] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:35:18] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:35:18]     (128.143.199.97:80)  
                   [00:35:18]   Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in queue.  
                   [00:35:48] Project: 6099 (Run 4, Clone 22, Gen 173)  
                   
                   
                   [00:35:48] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:35:48 UTC]  
                   [00:35:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:35:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:35:48]     (128.143.231.202:8080)  
                   [00:35:48] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:35:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:35:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:35:48]     (128.143.231.202:80)  
                   [00:35:48] - Error: Could not transmit unit 01 (completed May 27) to work server.  
                   
                   
                   [00:35:48] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:35:48 UTC]  
                   [00:35:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:35:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:35:48]     (128.143.199.97:8080)  
                   [00:35:48] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:35:48] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:35:48] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:35:48]     (128.143.199.97:80)  
                   [00:35:49]   Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in queue.  
                   [00:36:19] Project: 6099 (Run 4, Clone 22, Gen 173)  
                   
                   
                   [00:36:19] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:36:19 UTC]  
                   [00:36:19] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:36:19] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:36:19]     (128.143.231.202:8080)  
                   [00:36:19] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:36:19] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:36:19] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:36:19]     (128.143.231.202:80)  
                   [00:36:19] - Error: Could not transmit unit 01 (completed May 27) to work server.  
                   
                   
                   [00:36:19] + Attempting to send results [May 27 00:36:19 UTC]  
                   [00:36:19] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:36:19] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:36:19]     (128.143.199.97:8080)  
                   [00:36:19] + Retrying using alternative port  
                   [00:36:19] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server  
                   [00:36:19] + Could not connect to Work Server (results)  
                   [00:36:19]     (128.143.199.97:80)  
                   [00:36:19]   Could not transmit unit 01 to Collection server; keeping in queue.  
                   [00:36:49] Project: 6099 (Run 4, Clone 22, Gen 173)  
                   [00:36:49] - Error: Could not get length of results file work/wuresults_01.dat  
                   [00:36:49] - Error: Could not read unit 01 file. Removing from queue.  
                   [00:37:19] + -oneunit flag given and have now finished a unit. Exiting.- Preparing to get new work unit...  
                   [00:37:19] Cleaning up work directory  
                   
                   Folding@Home Client Shutdown. 

                  <message edited by iDreadnaught on Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:50 PM>

                   

                   
                    linuxrouter

                    • Total Posts : 7751
                    • Joined: 2/28/2008
                    • Status: offline
                    • Ribbons: 77
                    • Folding: 16,596,182
                    Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Saturday, May 26, 2012 5:49 PM (permalink)
                    Possibly. For some reason, the folding client does not have network connectivity to transmit the work unit to the server over port 8080 or 80. It could be a server issue or a firewall related issue somewhere on the network that is preventing access to those ports. Server issues are not too uncommon. I have seen server related issues quite a few times before.
                     
                      iDreadnaught

                      • Total Posts : 130
                      • Joined: 4/16/2012
                      • Location: Florida
                      • Status: offline
                      • Ribbons: 1
                      • Folding: 6,280,609
                      Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Saturday, May 26, 2012 6:08 PM (permalink)
                      I'll try it again in a few, luckily I made a backup at 98%

                       

                       
                        iDreadnaught

                        • Total Posts : 130
                        • Joined: 4/16/2012
                        • Location: Florida
                        • Status: offline
                        • Ribbons: 1
                        • Folding: 6,280,609
                        Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Saturday, May 26, 2012 11:31 PM (permalink)
                        Well unfortunately, just finished a different WU with the same results as the first one, it won't send the results back. This time  P7142.
                         
                         [06:01:01] Completed 500000 out of 500000 steps  (100%) 
                         [06:01:02] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000 
                         [06:01:12]  
                         [06:01:12] Finished Work Unit: 
                         [06:01:12] - Reading up to 3709584 from "work/wudata_02.trr": Read 3709584 
                         [06:01:12] trr file hash check passed. 
                         [06:01:12] edr file hash check passed. 
                         [06:01:12] logfile size: 62556 
                         [06:01:12] Leaving Run 
                         [06:01:14] - Writing 3808100 bytes of core data to disk... 
                         [06:01:15] Done: 3807588 -> 3524930 (compressed to 92.5 percent) 
                         [06:01:15]   ... Done. 
                         [06:01:15] - Shutting down core 
                         [06:01:15]  
                         [06:01:15] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT 
                         [06:01:15] CoreStatus = 64 (100) 
                         [06:01:15] Sending work to server 
                         [06:01:15] Project: 7142 (Run 0, Clone 71, Gen 327) 
                         
                         
                         [06:01:15] + Attempting to send results [May 27 06:01:15 UTC] 
                         [06:01:15] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:01:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:01:15]     (128.143.199.96:8080) 
                         [06:01:15] + Retrying using alternative port 
                         [06:01:15] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:01:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:01:15]     (128.143.199.96:80) 
                         [06:01:15] - Error: Could not transmit unit 02 (completed May 27) to work server. 
                         [06:01:15]   Keeping unit 02 in queue. 
                         [06:01:15] Project: 7142 (Run 0, Clone 71, Gen 327) 
                         
                         
                         [06:01:15] + Attempting to send results [May 27 06:01:15 UTC] 
                         [06:01:15] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:01:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:01:15]     (128.143.199.96:8080) 
                         [06:01:15] + Retrying using alternative port 
                         [06:01:15] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:01:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:01:15]     (128.143.199.96:80) 
                         [06:01:15] - Error: Could not transmit unit 02 (completed May 27) to work server. 
                         
                         
                         [06:01:15] + Attempting to send results [May 27 06:01:15 UTC] 
                         [06:01:15] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:01:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:01:15]     (130.237.165.141:8080) 
                         [06:01:15] + Retrying using alternative port 
                         [06:01:15] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:01:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:01:15]     (130.237.165.141:80) 
                         [06:01:15]   Could not transmit unit 02 to Collection server; keeping in queue. 
                         [06:01:45] Project: 7142 (Run 0, Clone 71, Gen 327) 
                         
                         
                         [06:01:45] + Attempting to send results [May 27 06:01:45 UTC] 
                         [06:01:45] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:01:45] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:01:45]     (128.143.199.96:8080) 
                         [06:01:45] + Retrying using alternative port 
                         [06:01:45] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:01:45] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:01:45]     (128.143.199.96:80) 
                         [06:01:45] - Error: Could not transmit unit 02 (completed May 27) to work server. 
                         
                         
                         [06:01:45] + Attempting to send results [May 27 06:01:45 UTC] 
                         [06:01:45] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:01:45] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:01:45]     (130.237.165.141:8080) 
                         [06:01:45] + Retrying using alternative port 
                         [06:01:45] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:01:45] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:01:45]     (130.237.165.141:80) 
                         [06:01:45]   Could not transmit unit 02 to Collection server; keeping in queue. 
                         [06:02:15] Project: 7142 (Run 0, Clone 71, Gen 327) 
                         
                         
                         [06:02:15] + Attempting to send results [May 27 06:02:15 UTC] 
                         [06:02:15] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:02:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:02:15]     (128.143.199.96:8080) 
                         [06:02:15] + Retrying using alternative port 
                         [06:02:15] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:02:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:02:15]     (128.143.199.96:80) 
                         [06:02:15] - Error: Could not transmit unit 02 (completed May 27) to work server. 
                         
                         
                         [06:02:15] + Attempting to send results [May 27 06:02:15 UTC] 
                         [06:02:15] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:02:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:02:15]     (130.237.165.141:8080) 
                         [06:02:15] + Retrying using alternative port 
                         [06:02:15] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:02:15] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:02:15]     (130.237.165.141:80) 
                         [06:02:15]   Could not transmit unit 02 to Collection server; keeping in queue. 
                         [06:02:45] Project: 7142 (Run 0, Clone 71, Gen 327) 
                         
                         
                         [06:02:45] + Attempting to send results [May 27 06:02:45 UTC] 
                         [06:02:45] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:02:45] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:02:45]     (128.143.199.96:8080) 
                         [06:02:45] + Retrying using alternative port 
                         [06:02:45] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:02:45] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:02:45]     (128.143.199.96:80) 
                         [06:02:45] - Error: Could not transmit unit 02 (completed May 27) to work server. 
                         
                         
                         [06:02:45] + Attempting to send results [May 27 06:02:45 UTC] 
                         [06:02:45] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:02:45] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:02:45]     (130.237.165.141:8080) 
                         [06:02:45] + Retrying using alternative port 
                         [06:02:45] - Couldn't send HTTP request to server 
                         [06:02:45] + Could not connect to Work Server (results) 
                         [06:02:45]     (130.237.165.141:80) 
                         [06:02:45]   Could not transmit unit 02 to Collection server; keeping in queue. 
                         [06:03:15] Project: 7142 (Run 0, Clone 71, Gen 327) 
                         [06:03:15] - Error: Could not get length of results file work/wuresults_02.dat 
                         [06:03:15] - Error: Could not read unit 02 file. Removing from queue. 
                         [06:03:45] + -oneunit flag given and have now finished a unit. Exiting.- Preparing to get new work unit... 
                         [06:03:45] Cleaning up work directory 
                         
                         Folding@Home Client Shutdown

                         
                        -send all does this,
                         Launch directory: /usr/local/fah 
                         Executable: ./fah6 
                         Arguments: -send all  
                         
                         [06:19:20] - Ask before connecting: No 
                         [06:19:20] - Proxy: localhost:8080 
                         [06:19:20] - User name: iDreadnaught (Team 111065) 
                         [06:19:20] - User ID: 788E6E6F76BE08C2 
                         [06:19:20] - Machine ID: 1 
                         [06:19:20]  
                         [06:19:21] Loaded queue successfully. 
                         [06:19:21] Attempting to return result(s) to server... 
                         
                         Folding@Home Client Shutdown.

                         
                        But then -queueinfo still shows shows
                         Launch directory: /usr/local/fah 
                         Executable: ./fah6 
                         Arguments: -queueinfo  
                         
                         [06:20:52] - Ask before connecting: No 
                         [06:20:52] - Proxy: localhost:8080 
                         [06:20:52] - User name: iDreadnaught (Team 111065) 
                         [06:20:52] - User ID: 788E6E6F76BE08C2 
                         [06:20:52] - Machine ID: 1 
                         [06:20:52]  
                         [06:20:52] Loaded queue successfully. 
                         [06:20:52] Printing Queue Information 
                         Current Queue:  
                         Slot 03  Empty/Deleted 
                         
                         Slot 04  Empty/Deleted 
                         
                         Slot 05  Empty/Deleted 
                         
                         Slot 06  Empty/Deleted 
                         
                         Slot 07  Empty/Deleted 
                         
                         Slot 08  Empty/Deleted 
                         
                         Slot 09  Empty/Deleted 
                         
                         Slot 00  Empty/Deleted 
                         
                         Slot 01  Empty/Deleted 
                         Project: 6099 (Run 4, Clone 22, Gen 173), Core: a3 
                         Work server: 128.143.231.202:8080 
                         Collection server: 128.143.199.97 
                         Download date: May 25 22:13:34 
                         Finished date: May 27 01:10:55 
                         
                         Slot 02 *Empty/Deleted 
                         Project: 7142 (Run 0, Clone 71, Gen 327), Core: a3 
                         Work server: 128.143.199.96:8080 
                         Collection server: 130.237.165.141 
                         Download date: May 27 01:11:00 
                         Finished date: May 27 06:01:15

                         
                        I'm lost, don't really want to have it running when it can't send results back for some reason. I don't think it's related to my network or firewall because my v7 client on the same host is able to send my GPU WU's back. Any help is appreciated, I'll browse around to see if I can find some more info in the mean time.

                         

                         
                          arvidab

                          • Total Posts : 5
                          • Joined: 5/13/2012
                          • Status: offline
                          Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Sunday, May 27, 2012 7:10 AM (permalink)
                          Have you tried setting the network adapter for the VM to bridged? The default for Vbox is NAT and sometime can cause problems, bridged always works for me. Worth a try at least.
                           
                            iDreadnaught

                            • Total Posts : 130
                            • Joined: 4/16/2012
                            • Location: Florida
                            • Status: offline
                            • Ribbons: 1
                            • Folding: 6,280,609
                            Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Sunday, May 27, 2012 8:35 AM (permalink)
                            Yes I have it set to bridged because NAT mode assigned an IP out of range of my network and I couldn't setup FAHMon, nor ping it's IP unless I had it set in bridged mode.

                             

                             
                              iDreadnaught

                              • Total Posts : 130
                              • Joined: 4/16/2012
                              • Location: Florida
                              • Status: offline
                              • Ribbons: 1
                              • Folding: 6,280,609
                              Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Wednesday, May 30, 2012 8:10 PM (permalink)
                              linuxrouter

                               
                              It could be a server issue or a firewall related issue somewhere on the network that is preventing access to those ports.

                               
                              Well, I feel like an idiot.  The problem was my PeerBlock software. The host OS folds all day completing handshakes and downloading/uploading WU's, which is why I overlooked it. But PeerBlock apparently allows the VM to download a WU, but would not allow it to upload it back to Stanford. I don't understand why but I won't argue with success, everything is running fine now.
                               
                              ~iDreadnaught

                               

                               
                                linuxrouter

                                • Total Posts : 7751
                                • Joined: 2/28/2008
                                • Status: offline
                                • Ribbons: 77
                                • Folding: 16,596,182
                                Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Friday, June 01, 2012 7:16 AM (permalink)
                                Glad to hear you found what was causing the upload failure. :)
                                 
                                  linuxrouter

                                  • Total Posts : 7751
                                  • Joined: 2/28/2008
                                  • Status: offline
                                  • Ribbons: 77
                                  • Folding: 16,596,182
                                  Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Thursday, July 05, 2012 3:00 PM (permalink)
                                  Over the past few months I received E-mail's from users of my images to add a few things including kernel builds for additional architectures, slapt-get Slackware package management tool, and thekraken developed by Tear. As such, I have made a few updates to my Virtualbox image so far with the following.
                                   
                                  + Built kernel 3.4.4 for the following CPU types using GCC 4.7 and binutils 2.22:
                                      Intel: Core 2, Nehalem, Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, Haswell AMD: Barcelona, Bulldozer, Piledriver
                                  + Added slapt-get 13.37 and dependencies and set to source off a slackware64-current mirror.
                                  + Updated Tear's Langouste and TheKraken tools to the latest versions available.
                                      Langouste: 0.15.7, TheKraken: 0.17-pre15
                                  + Installed VirtualBox Additions 4.1.18
                                   
                                  
                                  I do not have all these different processor types so I cannot say for sure what if any difference building the kernel for specific architectures will help with folding. I also received a request to attempt to build the kernel with AMD's compiler for Bulldozer. I have not had a chance to look into that yet but it seems like an interesting project that I would like to look into.
                                   
                                  Testing with Virtualbox 4.1.18, I am seeing near the same performance as running in native Linux.
                                   
                                  P7506 - 3930K @ 4.25 GHz - smp 12
                                  Virtualbox: 2:08
                                  Native: 2:05
                                   
                                  This new version of Virtualbox appears to have some delay with ACPI shutdown. If you see a delay on reboot or shutdown, I think it might have to do with this new version.
                                   
                                    arvidab

                                    • Total Posts : 5
                                    • Joined: 5/13/2012
                                    • Status: offline
                                    Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Thursday, July 05, 2012 3:11 PM (permalink)
                                    Thanks for all the hard work, LR, really appreciated. I'd love to test out the new version native on my Sandy.
                                     
                                    When you compare with native, I assume it's the same build as in the VM?
                                     
                                      linuxrouter

                                      • Total Posts : 7751
                                      • Joined: 2/28/2008
                                      • Status: offline
                                      • Ribbons: 77
                                      • Folding: 16,596,182
                                      Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Thursday, July 05, 2012 3:29 PM (permalink)
                                      That was with the same build. I still have to  update my native installer which I hope to do soon. I will basically copy what is setup for VB but then build the kernels with the necessary SATA/SAS and Ethernet support to cover different motherboard types.
                                       
                                        arvidab

                                        • Total Posts : 5
                                        • Joined: 5/13/2012
                                        • Status: offline
                                        Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Thursday, July 05, 2012 6:28 PM (permalink)
                                        Sounds great, will sure try it out.
                                         
                                          arvidab

                                          • Total Posts : 5
                                          • Joined: 5/13/2012
                                          • Status: offline
                                          Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:31 PM (permalink)
                                          Double post I know...
                                           
                                          Would the Barcelona option be the choice for any K10 (Phenom II, Opteron 61xx etc) based CPU? I'd guess so, but I'm unable to test this right now.
                                          <message edited by arvidab on Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:44 PM>
                                           
                                            linuxrouter

                                            • Total Posts : 7751
                                            • Joined: 2/28/2008
                                            • Status: offline
                                            • Ribbons: 77
                                            • Folding: 16,596,182
                                            Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Thursday, July 19, 2012 11:20 PM (permalink)
                                            arvidab


                                            Double post I know...

                                            Would the Barcelona option be the choice for any K10 (Phenom II, Opteron 61xx etc) based CPU? I'd guess so, but I'm unable to test this right now.

                                             
                                            Barcelona includes family 10h or K10 so that kernel should work for your processors in this family.
                                            <message edited by linuxrouter on Thursday, July 19, 2012 11:21 PM>
                                             
                                              TheWolf

                                              • Total Posts : 2624
                                              • Joined: 11/14/2007
                                              • Location: Pascagoula, Ms
                                              • Status: online
                                              • Ribbons: 7
                                              • Folding: 131,116,790
                                              Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:39 PM (permalink)
                                              Here is where I am. I'm wanting to setup folding on a SR2 with CPU's E5645 & E5620 20 cores.
                                               
                                              What would be best to use for this in the OS of Windows 7 64bit Virtualbox 4.1.18 or
                                              something else & what image should I use?
                                              Links would be a great help. Some of the links on 1st page don't seem to work for me at this time.
                                              Been a while since I done a VM so I may need some help a long the way.
                                              Thanks
                                              <message edited by TheWolf on Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:40 PM>
                                               
                                                linuxrouter

                                                • Total Posts : 7751
                                                • Joined: 2/28/2008
                                                • Status: offline
                                                • Ribbons: 77
                                                • Folding: 16,596,182
                                                Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Friday, August 10, 2012 9:56 PM (permalink)
                                                TheWolf

                                                Here is where I am. I'm wanting to setup folding on a SR2 with CPU's E5645 & E5620 20 cores.

                                                What would be best to use for this in the OS of Windows 7 64bit Virtualbox 4.1.18 or
                                                something else & what image should I use?
                                                Links would be a great help. Some of the links on 1st page don't seem to work for me at this time.
                                                Been a while since I done a VM so I may need some help a long the way.
                                                Thanks

                                                 
                                                If you plan to run GPU folding or need Windows OS for running other apps, the Virtualbox image should work good and from my testing is close to performance of folding in standalone Linux.
                                                 
                                                Here is a link to my latest Virtualbox image:
                                                 
                                                Virtualbox 1.5.0 image
                                                 
                                                The Internet connection to my server is unfortunately not the best so there may occasionally be an issue accessing the site.
                                                <message edited by linuxrouter on Friday, August 10, 2012 9:59 PM>
                                                 
                                                  TheWolf

                                                  • Total Posts : 2624
                                                  • Joined: 11/14/2007
                                                  • Location: Pascagoula, Ms
                                                  • Status: online
                                                  • Ribbons: 7
                                                  • Folding: 131,116,790
                                                  Re:VMware 3.0 && bigadv folding Sunday, August 12, 2012 9:37 PM (permalink)
                                                  linuxrouter


                                                  TheWolf

                                                  Here is where I am. I'm wanting to setup folding on a SR2 with CPU's E5645 & E5620 20 cores.

                                                  What would be best to use for this in the OS of Windows 7 64bit Virtualbox 4.1.18 or
                                                  something else & what image should I use?
                                                  Links would be a great help. Some of the links on 1st page don't seem to work for me at this time.
                                                  Been a while since I done a VM so I may need some help a long the way.
                                                  Thanks


                                                  If you plan to run GPU folding or need Windows OS for running other apps, the Virtualbox image should work good and from my testing is close to performance of folding in standalone Linux.

                                                  Here is a link to my latest Virtualbox image:

                                                  Virtualbox 1.5.0 image

                                                  The Internet connection to my server is unfortunately not the best so there may occasionally be an issue accessing the site.

                                                  First off: Thanks for your wonderful thread and hard work.
                                                  I have it pretty much worked out now, but you can look at my progress here and make suggestion if you see anything I could do to make it any better.
                                                  Thanks again great work.
                                                   
                                                    Change Page: << < ..3132 | Showing page 32 of 32, messages 931 to 956 of 956

                                                    Jump to:

                                                    Current active users

                                                    There are 0 members and 2 guests.

                                                    Icon Legend and Permission

                                                    • New Messages
                                                    • No New Messages
                                                    • Hot Topic w/ New Messages
                                                    • Hot Topic w/o New Messages
                                                    • Locked w/ New Messages
                                                    • Locked w/o New Messages
                                                    • Read Message
                                                    • Post New Thread
                                                    • Reply to message
                                                    • Post New Poll
                                                    • Submit Vote
                                                    • Post reward post
                                                    • Delete my own posts
                                                    • Delete my own threads
                                                    • Rate post

                                                    2000-2013 ASPPlayground.NET Forum Version 3.8