1ceTr0n
Nah, i want the extra oomph from the 680 and I only game at 1920x1200 with no AA, so I don't need 4gigs of VRAM, its a waste.
if 200 + fps @ 1920 x 1200 and high gpu speeds is all you care about, when gaming, I think you're missing out on better picture quality, and that will be your loss... That little epeen factor does very little after a short period of time. A monster gpu like the 680 is made to push everything to the max. Even with a 680, you won't fully utilize it with 0x AA or FXAA or TXAA or CSAA.
Profile Update: 4/26/2013.
i7 3930K 2011 w/ EK Supremacy Copper @ 4.6 Ghz, w/ Prolimatech PK3 TIM, Avg Idle Temp @ 48 deg C
x79 ASrock Extreme 11.
65.5 GB Corsair Platinum 2133mhz @ 9-9-9-24 0.6667Ghz (not OC).
1 Asus ROG Ares II, 7970x2, 819 of 999 W/ Lonovo Display Port Cable.
Creative Sound Blaster Recon 3Di, Monster Inc Toslink, Asus Essence One DAC, Beyerdynamic Tesla 1.
Corsair AX 1200 Watt PSU.
Win7 Ultimate x64.
Dell U3011 @ 2560 x 1600, 60 hz.
OCZ Vertex 0.24 TB S3, PCIe OCZ RevoDrive 3 x2 0.48 TB, Segate 2TB HDD, WD VelociRaptor 0.6TB S3 HDD, OCZ Vertex 4 0.5 TB, 50 GB AsRock ScanDisk Drive, Samsung 840 500 GB.
Madcatz Cyborg MMO7.
Microsoft 4400 Ergonomic Keyboard.
Thrustmaster Hotas Warthog Joystick.