OCZ HydroFlow compared to a couple of other blocks on an OC'd E6400 (you may need to scroll):
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?214668-Cheap-high-flow-water-blocks&p=3585041 HydroFlow is +1 deg to an old EK Supreme, or +3 deg to an old HeatKiller 3.0 LC block.
http://skinneelabs.com/ek-supreme-hf-review/4/ This review shows a big comparison graph listing the performance of various blocks.
-The EK Supreme bottoms out at ~67.1 deg while the Supreme HF bottoms out at 64.3, a 3 degree difference.
-The HK 3.0 LC bottoms out at 66.8, a 2 degree to the Supreme HF.
- For comparison to the next graph, the Apogee XT bottomed out at 65 degrees, for a difference of ~2 degrees to the Supreme.
Lastly,
http://www.pureoverclock.com/review.php?id=1392&page=6 - The Apogee XT is ~1.5 degrees higher than the Raystorm.
So.....
The OCZ HydroFlow cools roughly 4.5 degrees (follow the Supreme to Apogee XT to Raystorm) worse than the Raystorm comparatively speaking. And yes, I know I abused maths to get this answer.
Considering that the top performance blocks all cool to within degree or so of each other, this is a substatial improvement.
tl;dr - your block doesnt look like its up to cooling your CPU and its time to get a new one. The Raystorm linked above is a good block without the expensive price tag of the top dogs and cools to about the same.
~Fus
"Abyss v2"
| Gigabyte GA-Z77MX-D3H | Core i5 3570k w/ XSPC Raystorm Waterblock | 32GB (4x8GB) G.Skill RipJaws X PC3-1600 10-10-10-30 (BXL) |
| EVGA GTX 260 w/ Koolance WB (Temporary) | Mushkin Kronos 128GB SSD | 1x Samsung F4 2TB | 1x Samsung F1 1TB |
| Corsair AX-650 | Fractal Design Arc Mini | 2x PULL AP-15s on Swiftech MCR240 | D5 w/ Koolance COV-PMP450A Top |
| Win7 x64 | Dell UltraSharp 2408WFPb | Dell UltraSharp 2407 WFPb |