﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>GT 210 vs Intel HD Graphics (i3 530)</title><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/</link><description /><copyright>(c) EVGA Forums</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>Re:GT 210 vs Intel HD Graphics (i3 530) (BMajdecki)</title><description>  Thank you. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1625963</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:26:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:GT 210 vs Intel HD Graphics (i3 530) (lehpron)</title><description>  Depending on the game or benchmark, the average is &lt;a href="http://techgage.com/article/asus_geforce_210_gt_220_gt_240/5" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;even&lt;/a&gt; (scroll three-quarter way to bottom of each game tested, see table.)&amp;nbsp; Though having the GT210 may add cost,&amp;nbsp;power,&amp;nbsp;heat and noise. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  Though ultimately, AMD's Fusion processors beat them all, the A8-3850&amp;nbsp;has&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/4476/amd-a83850-review/7" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;twice the performance&lt;/a&gt; of the HD3000 integrated video in Sandy Bridge.&amp;nbsp; Ivy Bridge's HD4000&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.dailygadgets.net/integrated-gpu-intel-hd-4000-vs-radeon-hd-6550d/11773/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;gets close&lt;/a&gt;, but&amp;nbsp;AMD has a successor known as &lt;a href="http://www.guru3d.com/news/amd-trinity-is-29-percent-faster-than-llano/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Trinity coming by mid-summer&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  Depends on your budget, ETA and what do plan to do. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1623358</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:49:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>GT 210 vs Intel HD Graphics (i3 530) (BMajdecki)</title><description>  What's faster Intel or Geforce? &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1623153</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 09:29:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>