﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>7680x1600 needs more than 2GB VRAM with AA!!!</title><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/</link><description /><copyright>(c) EVGA Forums</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>Re:7680x1600 needs more than 2GB VRAM with AA!!! (kingofsorrow)</title><description>  check the upper left corner  &lt;br&gt; &lt;img src="http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/mm275/kingofsorrow01/TESV_2321.jpg" /&gt; &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  that's 2321mb &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1621165</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:17:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:7680x1600 needs more than 2GB VRAM with AA!!! (jeffiva)</title><description>  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp;Metro 2033 runs very slow at 7680x1600 at high quality with 16x AA (not playable), but the memory usage surprisingly did not jump above 2 GB. The main thing I wanted to confirm is at what level of AA the memory usage jumped above 2 GB, and just for RAGE,&amp;nbsp; what I said in my above post doesn't necessarily apply to other games of course. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  I'm tempted to get the 4gb 670 SC's. But I was one of the unfortunately ones who got one of the bad 2gb 670 SC's, and I ended up returning it to Newegg instead of doing the evga RMA.&amp;nbsp; (Props to EVGA for being so helpful and courteous though). The 2gb 670 SC had a very loud fan which emitted this very annoying whine that I could hear constantly even at idle.&amp;nbsp; I don't know if the 4gb 670 SC uses the same reference small 670 PCB, or uses a larger 680-type PCB with a better fan (like on the 670 FTW). I wish I could find that out, but I can't find it anywhere!&amp;nbsp; Can anyone confirm if the 4GB 670 SC has the small reference 670 PCB or not?? &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  &lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;i&gt;raw2dogmeat&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Any other current titles you have tested? I run 3 x 28" monitors and have 2 x 4gb Evga 670's sitting in my cart at newegg..can't decide to buy or wait for the 680 4 gb's.  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;/blockquote&gt;  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1621148</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:04:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:7680x1600 needs more than 2GB VRAM with AA!!! (raw2dogmeat)</title><description>  Any other current titles you have tested? I run 3 x 28" monitors and have 2 x 4gb Evga 670's sitting in my cart at newegg..can't decide to buy or wait for the 680 4 gb's. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1621135</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:52:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:7680x1600 needs more than 2GB VRAM with AA!!! (kingofsorrow)</title><description>  Absolutely - my single 680gtx 4gb struggles at skyrim at that resolution but it still consumes 2300mb, and that's not the limit I guess!&amp;nbsp;I just run the game for couple of minutes just to test the memory consumption. I'm sure there are locations where it would hit 3gb with the above stock settings... lol &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1621131</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:50:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:7680x1600 needs more than 2GB VRAM with AA!!! (jeffiva)</title><description>  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp;There's so much disinformation out there right now about 2 GB vs 4 GB memory usage, I had to test &lt;br&gt;  it for myself.&amp;nbsp; A lot of people are arguing against the need for 4 GB because they say the &lt;br&gt;  processing power of these cards will be maxed out before you will need more than 2 GB. &lt;br&gt;  Well, that is totally false! &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  &lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;i&gt;kingofsorrow&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  omfg!! whata surprise. the ****ty skyrim consumes&amp;nbsp;more than&amp;nbsp;2300mb at 2560x1440 with hd pack with standart&amp;nbsp;8msaa and no additional mods. Well, I have selected 8x transparency AA from the nv cp too. And that's it - a single display.  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;/blockquote&gt;  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1621121</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:42:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:7680x1600 needs more than 2GB VRAM with AA!!! (jeffiva)</title><description>  In many scenes, especially outdoor ones, in objects in the background like cranes or building, or in any type of hanging wires such as power lines, the pixellation is very noticeable without AA, even at 7680x1600! &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  &lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;i&gt;callsignvega&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Why on Earth would you want to run 8x AA  on that high of a resolution? Your FPS would&amp;nbsp;plummet&amp;nbsp;with  an&amp;nbsp;imperceptible visual&amp;nbsp;improvement. On my 3x 30" setup I've found  anything above 2x AA a waste. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1621118</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:39:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:7680x1600 needs more than 2GB VRAM with AA!!! (kingofsorrow)</title><description>  omfg!! whata surprise. the ****ty skyrim consumes&amp;nbsp;more than&amp;nbsp;2300mb at 2560x1440 with hd pack with standart&amp;nbsp;8msaa and no additional mods. Well, I have selected 8x transparency AA from the nv cp too. And that's it - a single display. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1621113</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:36:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:7680x1600 needs more than 2GB VRAM with AA!!! (callsignvega)</title><description>  Why on Earth would you want to run 8x AA on that high of a resolution? Your FPS would&amp;nbsp;plummet&amp;nbsp;with an&amp;nbsp;imperceptible visual&amp;nbsp;improvement. On my 3x 30" setup I've found anything above 2x AA a waste. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1621111</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:34:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>7680x1600 needs more than 2GB VRAM with AA!!! (jeffiva)</title><description>  Using a single GTX 670 card with 2 GB VRAM, and using RAGE as a test game. 3 30 inch Dell U3011 monitors.&amp;nbsp; Testing in 7680x1600 with all settings maxed out, except for AA.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; With no AA, plays smoothly. With 2 x AA, smoothly. With 4x AA still smooth. Suddenly, when go to 8x AA&amp;nbsp; comes to a complete crawl. Using GPU-Z to monitor memory usage, going to 8 x AA is exactly when the memory shoots up to over 2 GB!&amp;nbsp; So this confirms it - those planning on super high resolutions need a 4 GB card unless you turn down AA a lot!&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Jeff &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1621100</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:23:53 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>