﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Questions about 4gb version</title><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/</link><description /><copyright>(c) EVGA Forums</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><item><title>Re:Questions about 4gb version (goutnout)</title><description>  This was an enlightening read thank you. I don't feel that bad for not waiting to purchase. The triple monitor results with 4xaa was interesting virtually no change. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526855</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:59:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Questions about 4gb version (lehpron)</title><description>  &lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;i&gt;_Bathory&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt; I don't think we'll see that much of a bump fps wise..maybe 3-4..it's more likely that the extra Vram will just allow you to increase your eye candy. The reference 680 is a really nice card and is capable of running games at that resolution as it is..&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yeah, unless something was wrong with &lt;a href="http://www.behardware.com/articles/844-1/geforce-gtx-580-3gb-vs-1-5gb-test-sli-and-surround.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;this small review&lt;/a&gt; testing the GTX580 1.5GB versus 3GB, it looks like overall performance is negligible with extra Vram.&amp;nbsp; Same would be the case from GTX680 2GB versus 4GB.&amp;nbsp; The buffer is just a temporary space, and only the GPU renders the scene.&amp;nbsp; Having extra Vram means little unless it is being used, so those games tested aren't cranked up high enough. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526836</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:43:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Questions about 4gb version (ssj92)</title><description>  I want to wait for the 4GB FTW edition to see how it performs otherwise its classified or 685 for me&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526812</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:30:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Questions about 4gb version (FattysGoneWild)</title><description>  FTW editions also have a pretty nice factory oc as well. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526764</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:57:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Questions about 4gb version (shazam)</title><description>  &lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;i&gt;ssj92&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  &lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;i&gt;shazam&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  What's the difference between the regular, Signature and Signature+ aaaand Signature+ 2? lol..&amp;nbsp;   &lt;br&gt;  &lt;/blockquote&gt;  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Regular is regular unless you mean SC which is a bit higher clocked from the factory.  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Signature has a different design, has a 8-pin+6-pin instead of 6-6 and also has a 5 phase PWN.  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Signature+ is just a signature model with a backplate included.&amp;nbsp;  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Signature 2+ is basically a signature+ with a different dual-fan cooler.  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  Thank you, this really helps clear things up for me. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  I suppose I shall wait for the Signature edition. Sig2 sounds like something that won't be out for a while. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526750</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:46:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Questions about 4gb version (ssj92)</title><description>  &lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;i&gt;shazam&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  What's the difference between the regular, Signature and Signature+ aaaand Signature+ 2? lol..&amp;nbsp;  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  Regular is regular unless you mean SC which is a bit higher clocked from the factory. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  Signature has a different design, has a 8-pin+6-pin instead of 6-6 and also has a 5 phase PWN. &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  Signature+ is just a signature model with a backplate included.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  Signature 2+ is basically a signature+ with a different dual-fan cooler. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526745</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:43:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Questions about 4gb version (shazam)</title><description>  What's the difference between the regular, Signature and Signature+ aaaand Signature+ 2? lol..&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526708</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:17:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Questions about 4gb version (dukenuke88)</title><description>  It's not just extra VRAM from what EVGA says &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  - Back plate &lt;br&gt;  - 8 Phase PWM &lt;br&gt;  - 8 + 6 power connectors &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  I hope it's under $600...but I have a feeling it won't be....SC with backplate is already at $530...then theres SC Signature and Signature+ and Signature 2...and we all know that will be above $530 in terms of pricing, since it has more features. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526695</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:11:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Questions about 4gb version (shazam)</title><description>  No more than $600. It's just extra VRAM, lol. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526675</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:05:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Questions about 4gb version (goutnout)</title><description>  I do love the AA. Thanks for the reply. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526668</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:02:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Re:Questions about 4gb version (_Bathory)</title><description>  &lt;blockquote class="quote"&gt;&lt;i&gt;goutnout&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt;   &lt;br&gt;  Any Idea on price point? I'm gaming on 5760x1080 how much of a performance bump can we expect to see on the 4gb version. I've seen some test video posted on triple monitor and the 2gb version is performing like a champ.  &lt;br&gt;  &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br&gt;  &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  I'm guessing that the FTW 4GB 680s will retail for around $550, there's no question that the extra Vram will help at your resolution, I don't think we'll see that much of a bump fps wise..maybe 3-4..it's more likely that the extra Vram will just allow you to increase your eye candy. The reference 680 is a really nice card and is capable of running games at that resolution as it is..but if you are a sucker for high levels of AA and such..then the 4GB version will be your best friend.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526636</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 12:34:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Questions about 4gb version (goutnout)</title><description>  Any Idea on price point? I'm gaming on 5760x1080 how much of a performance bump can we expect to see on the 4gb version. I've seen some test video posted on triple monitor and the 2gb version is performing like a champ. &lt;br&gt;  </description><link>http://www.evga.com/forums/fb.ashx?m=1526613</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 12:12:54 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>